“Conflicts of interest in vaccine safety research” by Gayle DeLong
Vaccine manufacturers have financial motives and public health officials have bureaucratic reasons that might lead them to sponsor research that concludes vaccines are safe.
Search Results for: biblical critique
Vaccines and FAKE Safety Testing
The notion of measuring risks of one vaccine relative to another in order to determine safety is not science, but sophistry. There is a world of difference between the relative risk of taking one poison instead of another poison and the absolute risk of taking one poison as opposed to no poison at all.
Refuting the Argument: “Romans 14 makes Vaccination a Matter of Christian Liberty”
Those who make vaccination a Romans 14 matter of liberty are oversimplifying, to put it mildly. The examples given in the text are food and days — not matters of life and death, and of moral law. They are not analogous. Health and morality are not “optional liberties.”
Refuting the Argument: “The Bible doesn’t Specifically Condemn Vaccines, so WE can’t Condemn Vaccines.”
A horrifically bad argument to justify vaccination that you may have heard goes like this: “Since the Bible does not specifically condemn vaccination, we cannot condemn vaccination.” Let’s refute this.
Is Ignorance a Moral Excuse to Vaccinate?
Is ignorance of the sin of vaccination morally excusable? That is, is it not sinful to vaccinate someone or be vaccinated if one does not know that it violates God’s law, such as the Sixth Commandment?