Due to the “coincidental” rise of “SADS,” many are probably now connecting the dots with “SIDS.”
“Sudden Infant Death Syndrome” (SIDS) is too often a euphemism to disguise sudden infant murder by vaccination. SIDS — at least by and large — is a relatively new occurrence in the history of man, but is now accepted as an unfortunate, but normal, way of life.
A “Crib death” was so infrequent in the pre-vaccination era that it was not even mentioned in the statistics, but it started to climb in the 1950s with the spread of mass vaccination against diseases of childhood. It became a matter of public and professional concern and even acquired a new name, “sudden infant death of unknown origin,” or, for short, SIDS.
This name is significant, in the light of subsequent controversies, since “of unknown origin” means exactly that. So, when the medical establishment assures us that SIDS is unrelated to vaccinations, the obvious response is, How do you know?, if it is defined as “of unknown origin”? At this (as with most common-sense questions about vaccinations) the medical establishment prefers to retire from the debate in dignified silence.
Harris L. Coulter, SIDS and Seizures (Center For Empirical Medicine, 1996). Retrieved February 3, 2023, from http://www.whale.to/v/coulter1.html
Dr. Viera Scheibner, a retired Principal Research Scientist, along with her husband Leif Karlsson, a biomedical engineer specialising in patient monitoring Systems, created a special device for monitoring infant breathing called the Cotwatch Breathing Monitor. With it they found evidence that vaccination can indeed cause crib death:
Inevitably, we began recording breathing patterns of babies after vaccination. The results of these recordings were presented to the 2nd Immunisation Conference, held in Canberra, 27~29th May 1991. We demonstrated that microprocessor records of babies’ breathing after DPT (Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus) injections reveal a pattern of flare-ups of Stress-Induced Breathing closely following the dynamics of adreno-cortical activity in an individual under stress and as observed by Dr Selye.
We also demonstrated that flare-ups of Stress-Induced Breathing in babies after administration of the DPT vaccine occur characteristically on certain days even though the amplitude of the flare-ups varies from child to child.
For seventy babies who succumbed to cot death, although babies could die on any day after DPT injection, there were significantly more deaths on the days which closely correlated with flare-ups of Stress-Induced Breathing after DPT injections. …
[B]abies may and do die for up to 25 or more days after vaccination, and still as a direct consequence of the toxic effects of the vaccines.
How do we know this? Because of the observed repetition of the pattern of flare-ups of Stress-Induced Breathing in a number of babies over a long period of time.
Viera Scheibner, Cot Deaths Linked to Vaccinations. Originally published in Nexus, Oct-Nov 1991. Retrieved March 16, 2023, from http://www.whale.to/vaccines/cot_death.html
The following further confirms Dr. Scheibner’s discovery:
Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Michelle Rowton James tell us that doctors about to vaccinate convalescent neonates routinely call the NICU to see if any beds are available, because serious respiratory and other problems are simply expected. Neonates and infants at home with their families are certainly still susceptible to those respiratory problems after routine vaccinations, but parents don’t monitor their kids’ vital signs, as do hospitals, and deaths occurring in such situations take place silently – but invariably would be labeled SIDS.
Shawn Siegel, “Weighing import,” Facebook (July 22, 2016). Retrieved March 17, 2023, from
https://www.facebook.com/shawn.siegel.7/posts/pfbid0HWTKK1Rg1yYcSGCTuSsXJDt4XU4DoLbbAooin1VRuFBwDj3QScyGTdNZtatxKAVxl
We also know, for absolute certain, that vaccination causes SIDS because of the countless testimonies of parents whose children died suddenly shortly after vaccination.
Just to give an example of how prevalent vaccine-caused “SIDS” is, a mother whose daughter was murdered by vaccination said,
And when I got to the SIDS Foundation, every single parent — and there was hundreds of them — approached me over the course of the different times that I went there, and every one of them asked, “Was your daughter immunized within days of her death?”
Now for a tragic personal example: Michael Belkin, in a testimony to Congress, said that his daughter Lyla Rose Belkin died after getting the Hepatitis B vaccine. The NY Medical Examiner ruled her death Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), conveniently neglecting to mention in the report the vaccine and Lyla’s swollen brain — obviously caused by the vaccine:
My daughter Lyla Rose Belkin died on September 16, 1998 at the age of five weeks, about 15 hours after receiving her second Hepatitis B vaccine booster shot. Lyla was a lively, alert five-week-old baby when I last held her in my arms. Little did I imagine as she gazed intently into my eyes with all the innocence and wonder of a newborn child that she would die that night. She was never ill before receiving the Hepatitis B shot that afternoon. At her final feeding that night, she was extremely agitated, noisy and feisty — and then she fell asleep suddenly and stopped breathing. The autopsy ruled out choking, The NY Medical Examiner ruled her death Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS).
But the NY Medical Examiner (Dr. Persechino) neglected to mention Lyla’s swollen brain or the hepatitis B vaccine in the autopsy report. The coroner spoke to my wife and I and our pediatrician (Dr. Zullo) the day of the autopsy and clearly stated that her brain was swollen. The pediatrician Dr. Zullo’s notes of that conversation are “brain swollen … not sure cause yet … could not see how recombinant vaccine could cause problem.”
SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion .. “it wasn’t this, it wasn’t that, everything has been ruled out and we don’t know what it was.” A swollen brain is not SIDS. Through conversations with other experienced pathologists, I subsequently discovered that brain inflammation is a classic adverse reaction to vaccination (with any vaccine) in the medical literature.
The Refusers, “Michael Belkin Testimony to Congress on Hepatitis B Vaccine” (May 18,1999). Retrieved December 15, 2018, from https://therefusers.com/michael-belkin-testimony-to-congress-on-hepatitis-b-vaccine
How many SIDS deaths are we talking about per year? Shawn Siegel, a thorough vaccine researcher, messaged me in 2018 that the officially reported numbers alone are 3,500 — rounding up to 10 deaths per day:
If we assume the bulk of SIDS deaths to be vaccine fatalities – and I believe there’s adequate evidence that that’s the case – that’s ten infant vaccine deaths on a daily basis. Viera [Scheibner] believes it’s much more than that, and I wouldn’t doubt it. In addition to the officially reported 3,500 SIDS deaths each year there are 11,000 First Day Deaths, but I have no idea how they categorize them – there certainly are legitimate reasons for first day deaths, and some of them may also be labeled SIDS, so would be part of the SIDS group. We’ll never know the specifics.
Shawn Siegel, Facebook message December 27, 2018.
But, it appears not even the bulk of the 3,500 SIDS deaths covers the number of infants dying suddenly from vaccines. The murders may be hiding under other labels – and who knows what the annual number of deaths actually are.
For instance, according to medical research journalist Neil Z. Miller, in a deceptive campaign to cover up the connection between vaccines and SIDS, the health authorities manipulated data that reduced annual SIDS deaths by hiding many under other categories:
From 1992 through 2001, the post-neonatal SIDS rate dropped by an average annual rate of 8.6%. It seemed as though the ‘Back to Sleep’ campaign was successful and that the real cause of SIDS was due not to vaccinations but from babies sleeping on their bellies. However, a closer inspection of the ICD — the 130 official ways for an infant to die — revealed a loophole. Medical certifiers, such as coroners, could choose from among several categories of death when a baby suddenly expired. They didn’t have to list the death as SIDS. Although the post-neonatal SIDS rate dropped by an average annual rate of 8.6% from 1992 through 2001 following the AAP’s seemingly successful ‘Back to Sleep’ campaign, the post-neonatal mortality rate from ‘suffocation in bed’ (ICD-9 code E913.0) increased during this same period at an average annual rate of 11.2. Sudden, unexplained infant deaths that were classified as SIDS prior to the ‘Back to Sleep’ campaign, were now being classified as deaths due to suffocation in bed!
The post-neonatal mortality rate from ‘suffocation other’ (ICD-9 code E913.1-E913.9), from ‘unknown and unspecified causes’ (ICD-9 code 799.9), and from ‘intent unknown’ (ICD-9 code E980-E989), all increased during this period as well. In Australia, a similar subterfuge seemed to occur. Researchers observed that when the SIDS rate decreased, deaths attributed to asphyxia increased.
Neil Miller, CDC Lists 131 Ways for an Infant to Die: Vaccines and Sudden Death (SIDS) (May 18, 2015) (Article originally published on NaturalNews.com). Retrieved March 18, 2023, from http://www.whale.to/c/cdc_lists_131_ways.html
We see the connection between infant death and vaccination by actions taken in Japan and England, where in the former the vaccination age raised to 2 years, and the in latter compliance significantly dropped. Dr. Viera Scheibner writes:
Between 1970 and 1974, 37 infant death occurred after DPT vaccination in Japan; because of this the doctors in one prefecture boycotted vaccination (Iwasa et al. 1985 and Noble et al. 1987). Consequently, the Japanese Government first stopped DPT vaccination for 2 months in 1975, and, when vaccination was resumed, the vaccination age was lifted to 2 years. Interestingly, not only the entity of sudden death disappeared from vaccine injury compensation claims (only 2 deaths were subject of vaccine injury compensation claims in the 2-year olds compared with 37 in younger children), but the the overall infant mortality has improved: Japan zoomed from 17th to first place in infant mortality in the world. This means that Japan moved from a very high bracket to the lowest infant mortality rate in the world (Jenny Scott 1991). Interestingly, Noble et al. (1987) who spent some 2 weeks in Japan studying the acellular whooping vaccine there, wrote that “It is difficult to exclude pertussis vaccines as a causal factor even when other etiologies are suggested, particularly when the adverse events occur in close temporal association with vaccination”.
The same thing happened in England after 1 July 1975 when thanks to the first media reports of brain damage linked to vaccination, parents stopped vaccinating: the compliance fell down to 30% or even 10% in some areas. As unwittingly documented by McFarlane (1982), the overall infant mortality rate plummeted. She wrote:
“The postneonatal mortality fell markedly in 1976, the year in which a sharp decline in perinatal mortality rate began. Between 1976 and 1979, however, neither the late nor the postneonatal mortality rates fell any further. Indeed, the postneonatal mortality rate increased, slightly among babies born in 1977”. This very closely correlates with the documented oscillations in vaccination compliance: low compliance was linked to low death rate and vice versa. The vaccination compliance was lowest in 1975-76. Then it started climbing up in 1977-78, simply because people have short memories and the new parents did not know about the publicity surrounding vaccination as the cause of serious side effects (young couples become interested in these issues only after they have their first children). Fine and Clarkson (1982) wrote “…it is surprising that the interepidemic period did not decrease after the 1974 fall in vaccine uptake.” They expected the incidence to increase in the unvaccinated children. Indeed, this interepidemic period was unusually long with the lowest incidence of whooping cough on record.
When in 1988 Japanese parents were given the choice to start vaccinating anything between 3 months of 4 years, obviously many ignorant parents started at 3 months because the low SIDS rate increased fourfold in the last 13 years (Byron Shire Echo; June 1994). The article quoted Professor Hiroshi Nishida of Tokyo Women’s Medical College, who said that the SIDS rate among babies aged under 1 year had sharply increased to 0.33 % in 1992 when compared with 0.07 % in 1980.
Viera Scheibner, Comments on JAPANESE SIDS REBUTTAL. Retrieved November 18, 2023, from http://www.whale.to/vaccines/scheibner1.html
It should, then be clear: if you want to end high infant mortality rates, then a great place to start is by demolishing the vaccine program.
Ultimately, what is needed is a national turning to Christ: maybe then, there will be eyes to see and ears to hear.
If you find this site helpful, please consider supporting our work.
