This vaccine debate on PBS, which took place a few years ago, is an example of the superior arguments of those who oppose vaccines. Watch especially the critiques of vaccines by Janet Edghill.
If you find this site helpful, please consider supporting our work.
(Visited 334 times, 1 visits today)
I wonder if this doctor who has treated those with measles: did she give them 2 doses of vitamin A according to the WHO recommends and studies that suggest this treatment has improved complication rates and death rates cut in almost half. Did she do this?
I would like to know why, if these doctors truly value others opinions and agree that some people have genetics that make them not suitable to receive vaccines, then why are they not applying this? If it were more than kip service, they would be arguing for these changes, wouldn’t they?
No one wants their kids to get sick or vaccine injured, yet they are still broadly recommended and almost no one is truly considered possibly medical exempt. Do medical exemptions include these genetic susceptibility? No.
Therefore, why should I believe they serve everyone?
Nicole,
They really are given their marching orders from Big Pharma — brainwashed like everyone else. I’m still waiting for pro-vax doctors to show their patients the package inserts showing the potential dangers of vaccines; however, this kills the “safe and effective” narrative.
I think it’s not appropriate for pharma to benefit from selling vaccines to third world citizens, when they do not have clean water, sanitation, or refrigeration/cold areas (there are non-emergency methods). The lack of vaccines isn’t sad, the lack of these basics is what is needed over all else!! Priorities people.
Nicole,
Agreed! Improved sanitation and hygiene are key to disease elimination, but disease elimination doesn’t seem to really be the priority …