by Steve Halbrook
Note: if you hold to the terrain theory, which says viruses don’t exist (that sicknesses that are attributed to viruses are actually from such things as toxins), you may still find this section useful “for the sake of argument” — that is, since vaccinators reject terrain theory (which renders vaccination useless and dangerous from the outset), this info takes their assumptions about germ theory and likewise renders vaccination useless and dangerous. Either way, vaccination must be jettisoned.
In our post “Small Amounts” of Vaccine Ingredients Can MULTIPLY to DANGEROUS Levels,” we noted that if the narratives of the vaccinators are correct about viruses, injected viruses can multiply within one’s body and thus cause disease and destroy one’s health.
Of course, the answer to this from the vaccinators is that this is not a problem due to “live, attenuated” and “inactivated” vaccines. We are told that these will minimize (through live, attenuated vaccines) or completely eliminate (through inactivated vaccines) the threat of multiplication of disease-causing microbes that would otherwise occur via vaccination.
First, however, such innovations make the narrative about vaccines eradicating disease in the early days of vaccination disingenuous. Since early vaccines were not “attenuated” or “inactivated,” they could not – by the standards of the vaccinators themselves – prevent microbes from multiplying within a person, and thus how could they do anything but cause disease?
Second, vaccination is a matter of trust, and the vaccinators have been caught in lie after lie throughout vaccine history. So we don’t really know to what degree “attenuated” and “inactivated” vaccines are such.
Third, regarding the “live, attenuated” vaccine: while it is said to only have a “weakened” form of a disease-causing germ, since it is injected to such a vulnerable place as the bloodstream, it may be that even a “weakened” form can cause great havoc. Moreover, even the vaccinators themselves will admit that a “live, attenuated” vaccine is no guarantee that the injected virus won’t cause disease. As noted in the pro-vaccine website History of Vaccines:
One concern that must be considered is the potential for the vaccine virus to revert to a form capable of causing disease. Mutations that can occur when the vaccine virus replicates in the body may lead to a more virulent strain.
History of Vaccines, “Different Types of Vaccines.” Retrieved August 21, 2024, from https://historyofvaccines.org/vaccines-101/what-do-vaccines-do/different-types-vaccines
Fourth, regarding “inactivated” vaccines: we have no assurance that they are really inactivated. A prominent example is the infamous Cutter Incident, where countless “inactivated” vaccines resulted in “40 000 cases of polio”:
In April 1955 more than 200 000 children in five Western and mid-Western USA states received a polio vaccine in which the process of inactivating the live virus proved to be defective. Within days there were reports of paralysis and within a month the first mass vaccination programme against polio had to be abandoned. Subsequent investigations revealed that the vaccine, manufactured by the California-based family firm of Cutter Laboratories, had caused 40 000 cases of polio, leaving 200 children with varying degrees of paralysis and killing 10.
Fitzpatrick M. The Cutter Incident: How America’s First Polio Vaccine Led to a Growing Vaccine Crisis. J R Soc Med. 2006 Mar;99(3):156. PMCID: PMC1383764.
As it turns out, the official narrative is a limited hangout. There were actually multiple manufacturers that failed to inactivate their polio vaccines.
Even though Cutter Laboratories took the fall for the 1955 disaster, all manufacturers had difficulty killing the virus in their vaccines before and after the disaster. Cutter was not the only manufacturer documented to have produced live virus vaccine that was injected into children and caused paralysis. In 1990, after decades of information concealment, the Freedom of Information Act led to the release of documents that proved Wyeth also produced a paralyzing vaccine.
Wyeth and Cutter are thought today to have been the only companies that produced live virus vaccine; however, all the vaccine companies could have released active vaccine virus because the “minimum licensing requirements” set by the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare were not met by any pharmaceutical company.
Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk, Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History (Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk, 2015, 2013), 271.
So standards for inactivating vaccines may not be as tight as we are led to believe. Moreover, even if a vaccine is legitimately inactivated, it may not stay that way.
There were other more insidious and unaddressed problems with the Salk vaccine. Once a vaccine passed the minimum requirement tests showing that all the virus was theoretically killed, the virus was found to have resurrected on the shelves weeks or months later, even after the new safety standards were put in place in 1956. …
Swedish scientists, after the Cutter disaster in 1955, began to test some of their vaccine that was waiting to be dispensed. They did this in response to the alarming news coming from the United States about vaccine-induced paralysis. Tests were done on batches of vaccine that were previously shown to be free of active virus. Upon repeat testing, 30 percent of the vaccine samples showed the presence of active virus.
Ibid., 273, 274.
And so you can’t really count on a vaccine being “attenuated” or “inactivated.” But – there’s more.
Vaccines are usually made by growing cultures of the target virus or bacterium. Viruses need to grow in cells and so vaccine viruses are often grown in eggs (example influenza) or in cell lines derived from mammals, including humans.
GOV.UK, “Guide to the use of human and animal products in vaccines” (Updated 13 March 2023). Retrieved August 21, 2024, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/use-of-human-and-animal-products-in-vaccines/guide-to-the-use-of-human-and-animal-products-in-vaccines
Animal tissue can suffer contamination with other viruses, meaning that the use of animal tissue for vaccines renders them self-defeating. “Attenuation” and “inactivation” don’t do you much good if they don’t just control the virus they are vaccinating for, but other viruses in the vaccine:
Yet, vaccines, especially those relying upon animal tissue to culture viruses during the manufacturing process—the influenza, the MMR, and yellow fever vaccines—are known to be highly contaminated with foreign animal viruses (including Avian Leukosis Virus and Equine Arteritis Virus), genetic fragments of such viruses, oncogenes (genes that turn normal cells cancerous), and prions (tiny proteins responsible for incurable diseases and neurological disorders in animals and humans). Public awareness of this fact appeared in transcripts from private meetings of the Center for Disease Control’s Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee and the Evolving Scientific and Regulatory Perspective Workshop in 1998 and 1999 respectively and obtained by British investigative journalist Janine Roberts.
Richard Gale & Gary Null, “Death by Vaccination: The Gates Foundation and the New Eugenics” (Progressive Radio Network, September 22, 2010). Retrieved August 21, 2024, from http://whale.to/vaccine/death_by_vaccination.html
Speaking of Janine Roberts, she writes in her thoroughly researched book Fear of the Invisible,
Our vaccines … are not filtered clean but are suspensions from the manufacturers’ ‘intubation tanks’ in which the viruses are produced from ‘substrates’ of mashed bird embryo, minced monkey kidneys or cloned human cells. These suspensions are filtered before use but only to remove particles larger than viruses. The point of the vaccine is that it contains viruses, thus these must not be filtered out. This means there remains in the vaccine everything of the same size or smaller, including what the manufacturers call ‘degradation products’ – parts of decayed viruses or cells.
Janine Roberts, Fear of the Invisible: How scared should we be of Viruses and Vaccines, HIV and AIDS? (Leonid, Bristol Marina, Hanover Place, Bristol, U.K.: Impact Investigative Media Productions), 70, 71.
Discussing a meeting on September 7th, 1999 in Washington D.C., with “Representatives from all the largest public health institutions in the West … including the World Health Organization whose representative co-chaired it,” Roberts writes,
The scientists present then told that our vaccines are widely contaminated by viral and DNA genetic code fragments, many viruses and proteins. They openly worried that among these could also be dangerous prions or oncogenes.
Ibid., 73.
And so, given that vaccines are “widely contaminated” with viruses, we have the following letter of concern to Congressman Dan Burton in 1999:
The association between some viruses and some cancers is a well-accepted medical fact. Are there other viruses that may cause or lead to other cancers? Of course. There are literally tens of thousands of viruses, but only a small percentage has been tested for their ability to cause cancer. In fact, some viruses use a “team approach.” One virus by itself may be relatively benign but when it is combined with other viruses it “helps” the first one cause cancer. These viruses are literally called “helper viruses.” How many various combinations of different viruses can lead to cancer, no one knows. But when you consider that:
Children are injected with bacteria (that contain viruses)
Children are injected with viruses themselves as per the vaccine
The bacteria and virus vaccines are grown on animal tissue (i.e. monkeys, eggs, etc.) that also contain their own population of viruses
There is no way of knowing what viral combinations have formed and what is in the final “soup” that will be injected into a healthy infant. The toxicity test that vaccine manufacturers use is as crude as can be imagined. They inject mice with the vaccines and if a given percentage still eat and put on weight than the vaccine is pronounced safe for children. Unbelievable!
“Testimony of Raphaele Moreau-Horwin & Michael Horwin” (to Congressman Dan Burton) (August 12th, 1999). Retrieved August 22, 2024, from http://whale.to/vaccines/horwin.html
In short, “live, attenuated” and “inactivated” vaccines are unreliable and self-defeating:
- They destroy the narrative that unattenuated, activated vaccines in the early days were safe and effective.
- Vaccines are a matter of trust, but since the vaccinators have lied to us throughout vaccine history, we can have no confidence in vaccines being “attenuated” or “inactivated.”
- Regarding attenuated vaccines, “attenuating” may not be enough when injected in such a vulnerable area as the bloodstream, and by the admission of the vaccinators themselves, attenuated vaccines can still cause disease.
- Regarding “inactivated” vaccines, history shows that the standards for inactivating vaccines can be faulty, and that inactivated vaccines can reactivate.
- Due to the use of animal tissue, vaccines can be contaminated with other viruses which the vaccines do not even claim to protect from. The resulting viral soup could be very dangerous and cause cancer.
But it still gets worse. Even aside from viruses, the animal cells used in such vaccines can cause cancer and other serious diseases. See “Small Amounts” of Vaccine Ingredients Can MULTIPLY to DANGEROUS Levels.”
If you find this site helpful, please consider supporting our work.
