Christianity, Coronavirus, Quarantine

LEPER! LEPER! On Quarantine and Avoiding those Vaccinated for COVID-19

Share:

by Stephen Halbrook

see also
ALERT: Unvaccinated Women Report Miscarriages and Strange Menstrual Cycles after BEING NEAR Vaccinated People
Experts Discuss the VACCINATED becoming a BIOWEAPON affecting the UNVACCINATED
Were COVID-19 Vaccines Made To “Self-Spread” To Non-Vaccinated People?

Wow. The vaccinated are a threat to us all.

It is bad enough that with the rise of “vaccidents,” those given the COVID shot threaten us on the road. Now, they threaten even our social space, with news coming out that they are causing harm to those in proximity – even causing deaths via miscarriages.

Just how deadly this toxic transmission is, we still don’t know. Because this has only been recently discovered, we are still trying to figure out how this is happening. At the very least, the COVID-vaccinated are walking bioweapons that threaten the lives of the unborn, and the health – if not the very life itself as well – of the born.

As such, until we know more about this transmission, and how long it emanates from someone following vaccination, the vaccinated must be to some degree distanced from others — with the most ideal form of separation being solitary quarantine. I say ‘solitary” because I imagine the toxic transmission from the vaccinated not only affect the unvaccacinated in their proximity, but the vaccinated as well. And perhaps here the effect is much worse, as the immune systems of the vaccinated are more or less destroyed by the vaccine. Quarantining the vaccinated together could be extremely dangerous.

Of course, the vaccinated still need to be ministered to. So this is not to say that the vaccinated cannot ever be close to certain individuals — so long as those individuals know what they are getting into and count the cost.

Such mingling is up to them; however, the vaccinated should not be mingling closely with others without informed consent, such as walking around a public place with others who have not given said consent.

Sections in this article include:

  • How do we know the vaccinated are unleashing a toxic transmission?
  • Quarantine in Scripture
  • Quarantine in Christian history
  • When it comes to the COVID vaccine bioweapon, our governments encourage not quarantine, but mass transmission
  • So, what can we do?
  • What some businesses are doing

How do we know the vaccinated are unleashing a toxic transmission?

The proof is undeniable:

  • First, there are countless testimonies of women getting certain health problems, including strange menstrual cycles (even post-menopausal women) and even miscarriages after being close to those vaccinated. (By extension, one wonders how this might be affecting men. I have heard that it is affecting male reproductive organs, but am awaiting further confirmation.)
  • Second, the symptoms that the women are getting mirror symptoms of the vaccinated. Identical symptoms + countless testimonies can’t be a coincidence.

The two points above alone should suffice. But there’s more to consider:

  • Third, some vaccines/inoculation/shots have a history of causing illness via transmission. (Technically, it would be better to call the COVID vaccine a COVID shot.) So historically, this is nothing new. For instance, “shedding” is known to occur with live virus vaccines. Polio vaccination spread polio. We can actually go all the way back to the beginning, with smallpox variolation, the first form of smallpox inoculation.
  • Fourth, the COVID vaccine company Pfizer itself knows that the RNA COVID shot could potentially cause transmission. In a fairly recent study on RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer affirms this by stating,

    “An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention [the vaccine test subject], which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE [adverse event]. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care.”[1]

    The study further assumes the possibility of transmission from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated affecting pregnancy and breastfeeding. More here.
  • Fifth, there has already been a push for “self-spreading” vaccines. For instance, we find the 2018 Johns Hopkins report “Technologies to Address Global Catastrophic Biological Risks”:

    “Self-spreading vaccines are genetically engineered to move through populations like communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection. The vision is that a small number of individuals in a target population could be vaccinated, and the vaccine strain would then circulate in the population much like a pathogenic virus, resulting in rapid, widespread immunity.”[2]

    Such vaccines “could potentially be used to broadly inoculate human populations” in “the event of a grave public health threat.”[3]
  • Sixth, we know that the insane rich globalist elite who finance and control our governments want to depopulate the planet. How often do we hear the tired slogan from their liberal puppets, “the world is overpopulated”? And of course, the globalists use abortion to achieve this. But if they slay the unborn — the most helpless of all — don’t expect them to stop there. Anyways, any honest look at the death rates for the COVID vaccine should tell us that their primary purpose is genocide.

    Historically, the idea of using inoculations to kill and depopulate via spreading disease is nothing new. And in more recent history, “self-spreading” vaccines have been used to reduce “pest-populations.” We are, of course, the primary “pests” they want to reduce. We are reproducing “too quickly.” Even Johns Hopkins, which has pushed for self-spreading vaccines for humans, admits that they violate informed consent and can cause death — and yet, here we are:

    “[S]elf-spreading vaccines would potentially infect individuals with contraindications, such as allergies, that could be life-threatening. The ethical and regulatory challenges surrounding informed consent and prevention and monitoring of adverse events would be critical challenges to implementing this approach even in an extreme event.”[4]
Quarantine examination on a ship
(credit)

Quarantine and distancing in Scripture

Now that it has been established that those vaccinated for COVID are indeed walking bioweapons, how should this be dealt with?

Now, Scripture equips man “unto all good works” (2 Timothy 3:17b), which includes societal matters. So, what about dealing with those who could harm others in proximity?

In Scripture, quarantine was to be applied to those infected with leprosy. In his commentary on Leviticus, S. H. Kellogg writes:

Verses 45, 46 [in Leviticus 13], give the law for him who has been by the priest adjudged to be a leper. He must go with clothes rent, with his hair neglected, his lip covered, crying, ” Unclean ! unclean ! ” without the camp, and there abide alone for so long as he continues to be afflicted with the disease.

S. H. Kellogg, The Book of Leviticus (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1891), 333.

Of course, it’s hard to deny there are ceremonial aspects to this law, and we know that the ceremonial parts of the law of Moses are abrogated in the New Covenant era. But could there also be an abiding moral principle? Kellogg writes,

That a sanitary intent may very probably have been included in the purpose of this law, we are by no means inclined to deny. In earlier times, and all through the middle ages, the disease was regarded as contagious ; and lepers were accordingly segregated, as far as practicable, from the people. (Ibid, 334.)

While some would deny that the kind of leprosy in view in Scripture is the very dangerous kind we think of today, I think Kellogg sufficiently answers this objection in Chapter 17.

Moreover, from the Bible’s safety laws, we can infer a principle of quarantine or some kind of physical distancing or other precautions for the protection of those who would be harmed by a contagion. (Using our sense of proportion – some contagions are more serious than others, and some, like COVID-19, are hardly a threat to the general population.)

The Bible’s safety laws require putting a barrier (in one way or another) between a person and a potential threat. (Regarding vaccination, this principle would naturally mean to avoid vaccination). For instance, Scripture forbids endangering the blind with a stumbling block:

Thou shalt not curse the deaf, nor put a stumblingblock before the blind, but shalt fear thy God: I am the Lord. (Leviticus 19:14)

COVID vaccine transmission is, in a sense, putting a stumbling block before the blind, as it is a danger that one cannot see. We are all “blind” to its dangers.

Scripture elsewhere reinforces the idea that not only death and injury must be avoided, but the neglect of precautions that could result in such things:

When thou buildest a new house, then thou shalt make a battlement for thy roof, that thou bring not blood upon thine house, if any man fall from thence. (Deuteronomy 22:8)

Neglecting precautions, then, for something that is dangerous can make one morally culpable for someone harmed accidentally by it. Now, regarding the text above about making a battlement for one’s roof, keep in mind that the safety laws have underlying moral principles that apply beyond their particular application. Thus, Greg L. Bahnsen writes,

The Old Testament required that a railing be placed around one’s roof as a safety precaution, since guests were entertained on the flat roofs of houses in that ancient society; with our sloped roofs today we do not need to have the same literal railing, but the general underlying principle might very well require us to have the fence around our backyard swimming pool — again, to protect human life.

Greg L. Bahnsen, By this Standard: The Authority of God’s Law Today (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1985, 1991, 1998), 138.

The following describes the moral culpability of neglecting to take safety precautions after one is warned about a particular danger:

If an ox gore a man or a woman, that they die: then the ox shall be surely stoned, and his flesh shall not be eaten; but the owner of the ox shall be quit.

But if the ox were wont to push with his horn in time past, and it hath been testified to his owner, and he hath not kept him in, but that he hath killed a man or a woman; the ox shall be stoned, and his owner also shall be put to death.

If there be laid on him a sum of money, then he shall give for the ransom of his life whatsoever is laid upon him. (Exodus 21:28-30)

This situation is so serious that, if it results in death, it may warrant capital punishment by the state. The greater the knowledge, the greater the responsibility (Luke 12:47-48).

But we also see another duty here — not just on the part of the ox’s owner. This law describes warning the owner that his ox is dangerous. Since this law prioritizes the protection of life, we can take this as a moral duty to warn someone when he could endanger others by his actions.

And so to not make such a warning endangers others, as it keeps one from the knowledge that his actions could harm others to begin with. We are morally culpable if we do not take precautions to protect others — and also if we withhold information that would keep someone else from taking such precautions (also consider Ezekiel 33:6 and Proverbs 24:11, 12).

Those of us, then, who see the danger of COVID vaccine transmission should help get the word out about this problem. It may keep others from getting the shot to begin with (I have already heard of one such example). And those who have gotten it, if not completely hardened or brainwashed, may take steps to avoid exposing others. Maybe in time, this information will lead to a government-enforced quarantine or other measures in certain localities that are awake to the scamdemic. And of course, it could help everyone take precautions when being around the vaccinated.

Quarantine in Christian history

“The laws of quarantine have continued long enough to be enforced, and have been found to be attended with infinite advantage.”
— William Wilberforce

Throughout Christian history, the practice of quarantine has been used to minimize the spread of dangerous diseases.

R. J. Rushdoony writes,

It is also important to note that the observance of these laws helped eliminate Hansen’s disease, or true leprosy, faster in Europe than in other continents. In Europe, there were at least 9,000 hospitals for leprosy alone, maintained by Christian charity. Louis VII of France left legacies to more than 2,000 hospitals for lepers in his country; no ruler of our times has manifested any comparable charity. The Normans in France applied quarantine strictly, both in Normandy and in England. Thus, the very wealthy and influential Knight, Amiloun, was expelled from his castle to become a beggar when he contracted leprosy. The Lateran Council of 1172 required that special churches be built for lepers, and, in time, both hospitals and churches were available for lepers.

Rousas John Rushdoony, Commentaries on the Pentateuch: Leviticus (Vallecito, CA: Ross House Books, 2005), 144, 145.

Quarantine legislation implemented by the American Puritans would be “was a blueprint for the era” and was “carried out and modified throughout the colonial period.”[5]

The great Christian social reformer, William Wilberforce, said this of quarantine:

The laws of quarantine have continued long enough to be enforced, and have been found to be attended with infinite advantage. [6]

More about quarantine in Christian history here.

Quarantine, however, must be used carefully — and when really needed. We see today during the Scamdemic how it can be greatly abused to tyrannize civilizations and destroy human life. In the wrong hands, quarantine is genocide.

When it comes to the COVID vaccine bioweapon, our governments encourage not quarantine, but mass transmission

Despite the fact that those vaccinated for COVID-19 should face some level of isolation from the general population, governments are encouraging the opposite. This is, sadly, expected. Just as the rich globalists – which our governments are puppets of – want to mass murder us with the vaccine itself, they appear to also want to do so via vaccine transmission.

Red Newspaper writes,

People who are ignorant enough to be injected with an experimental vaccine that accelerates the generation of highly contagious super strains in their own bodies are walking biological time bombs and a threat to society.

The globalists know this, and consistent with their goals of global mass extermination, they are giving the most dangerous and most contagious people “vaccine passports” so they can freely roam across society, spreading their super strain viruses far and wide. Again, this is all by design.

Red Newspaper, Vaccinated People are Walking Biological Time Bombs and a Threat to Society (April 3, 2021). Retrieved May 6, 2021, from https://rednewspaper.com/?p=265

Now, in terms of depopulation, we know at the very least that the COVID vaccine, beyond regularly killing its recipients, has a toxic transmission to others that at least results in health problems, as well as outright miscarriages. Not surprising: the globalists have a proven history of clandestinely using vaccination for malevolent reasons, such as deliberately lacing vaccines with an ingredient that causes miscarriages.

As we previously discussed the push for self-spreading vaccines, let’s consider this from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists:

The bioweapon question. While researchers may intend to make self-spreading vaccines, others could repurpose their science and develop biological weapons. Such a self-spreading weapon may prove uncontrollable and irreversible. …

While there have been many biowarfare programs, including several that were far more elaborate and sophisticated, the South African program is particularly relevant in thinking through malicious uses of self-spreading vaccines. One of Project Coast’s research projects aimed at developing a human anti-fertility vaccine. …

It doesn’t take a massive leap of the imagination to see how the aims of South Africa’s anti-fertility vaccine project would have benefited from research into self-spreading vaccines, particularly if you combine it with current developments in pharmacogenomics, drug development, and personalized medicine. Taken together, these strands of research could help enable ultra-targeted biological warfare.

Filippa Lentzos and Guy Reeves, Scientists are working on vaccines that spread like a disease. What could possibly go wrong?, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (September 18, 2020). Retrieved May 11, 2021, from https://thebulletin.org/2020/09/scientists-are-working-on-vaccines-that-spread-like-a-disease-what-could-possibly-go-wrong/

Also, it’s important to note that historically, self-spreading vaccines have been used for depopulation of “pest populations” — and of course, to the globalists, we are the pests, “overpopulating” the planet. As Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists also notes:

Self-spreading vaccines have some of their roots in efforts to reduce pest populations. Australian researchers described a virally spread immunocontraception, which hijacked the immune systems of infected animals—in this case a non-native mouse species in Australia—and prevented them from fertilizing offspring. The earliest self-spreading vaccine efforts targeted two highly lethal infectious diseases in the European rabbit population (myxoma virus and rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus). In 2001, Spanish researchers field-tested a vaccine in a wild rabbit population living on Isla del Aire, a small Spanish island just off Menorca. The vaccine spread to more than half the 300 rabbits on the island, and the trial was deemed a success.

Ibid.

Historically, self-spreading vaccines have been used to eradicate
“pest populations.” Currently, we are the pests, destroying the
planet via “overpopulating” — and the COVID
vaccine is the “antidote.”

So, what can we do?

When those vaccinated do not take precautions to keep from infecting others, and governments are encouraging them to do the opposite of what they should do, there are still things we can do. Even if the vaccinated don’t refrain from getting close to us, we can refrain from getting close to them.
At least as much as it is realistic, of course.

I realize this is not always easy when it comes to such things as family members living in the same house, or the need to embrace a loved one dying from the shot. Christians also have a need to assemble to publicly worship God, and the lost still need to be evangelized.

So, we must carefully weigh priorities in any given social situation. In some situations, we may decide to take some degree of risk for the sake of others.

(But another thing to consider is this: can recipients of the toxic transmission from a vaccinated person in turn spread the transmission on to the next person, and the next, and so on like dominoes? We don’t know yet.)

Sad that it has gotten to this, but physical, or “social,” distancing from those who are or may have been vaccinated, is now something for even those with strong immune systems to consider. (But of course, social distancing has its own issues.) We are not talking about an overhyped virus like COVID-19 – but a bioweapon which we still don’t know enough about.

For me, masks are out of the question. But, keeping a strong immune system can’t hurt. Exercise, eat right, take supplements, get sufficient rest, and avoid a spirit of fearfulness. As much as possible, try to avoid the germophobic extremes of the COVIDian Cult.

Most of all, trust in the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

Also: be informed as to what may be causing the spread, so you can make educated decisions. This panel discussion includes some interesting theories. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny gives regular talks on the latest in this situation. (Search her name on Bitchute and check for the newest updates.) However, as she has noted, we still don’t know enough, and it may be some time before we do – although there are those behind the scenes working to discover what exactly is going on.

What some businesses are doing

On a business level, we are already seeing what some are doing to protect employees and customers from the vaccinated.

Miami school asks employees to not get COVID shot before the end of the school year

GreenMedinfo reports:

Centner Academy, a private school in Miami, has made international headlines for directing its employees who have not yet received the experimental COVID-19 vaccine, to wait until the end of the school year, as a precautionary step to protect the health of their school community, given both concerning new anecdotal reports that the vaccinated can adversely affect the health of the un-vaccinated, and that that clinical safety and efficacy data for the mRNA vaccines will not be completed until sometime in 2023.

Sayer Ji, Miami School Asks Staff Not to Take COVID Jab; Global Media Assault Follows; Pfizer Trial May Support School’s Concerns, GreenMedinfo (May 7, 2021). Retrieved May 8, 2021, from https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/miami-school-asks-staff-not-take-covid-jab-global-media-assault-follows-pfizer-tra1

This was sent by Centner Academy’s CEO to her employees:

Tens of thousands of women all over the world have recently been reporting adverse reproductive issues simply from being in close proximity with those who have received any one of the COVID-19 injections, e.g., irregular menses, bleeding, miscarriages, post-menopausal hemorrhaging, and amenorrhea (complete loss of menstruation).

No one knows exactly what may be causing these irregularities, but it appears that those who have received the injections may be transmitting something from their bodies to those with whom they come in contact. Until more is known, we must err on the side of caution when it comes to the welfare of our students and the school team.”

Cited in Ibid.

Doctor declines vaccinated patients

A one Dr. Baker is declining patients who are vaccinated, at least for a 30-day period.

I have to take a stance in order to protect the people in my office. I am not willing to watch somebody who made a poor decision and got the shot stand next to a young female in my office and risk the chance of her becoming infertile. It’s not happening on my watch. …

I’m asking them to quarantine for 30 days outside of my office. Why 30 days? I have no clue. I’m just trying to be nice. … I don’t know if they’re only spitting proteins for 30 days or the rest of their life. But I figure if it’s at least 30 days — maybe if it’s worse in the beginning …

Martial arts school refuses membership to those who got the COVID shot

A martial arts school in Kelowna, Canada, has refused membership to those who got the COVID shot. According to the membership application of Flow Academy:

Please be advised: to ensure the safety of ourselves, our business and our existing members, Flow Academy will not be accepting any Applications for Membership from anyone who has received any of the vaccine options for COVID-19. This decision was made after much discussion with other health, wellness and fitness-related facilities across Canada (both public and private), as well as liability insurance companies. To put it simply, the unknown health effects of the mRNA vaccines, as well as reported side effects such as viral shedding, seizures and death following the administration of these vaccines, are not covered by our liability. We apologize for any inconvenience, and will re-evaluate our policy when clinical trials of this experimental injection are completed in 2023. Thank you.

Canadian gold shop refuses entry to those who got the COVID shot

In a gold shop in Kelowna, Canada, a sign reads:

To assure the safety of ourselves and our existing clients, please be advised that Sun City Silver cannot allow entry to individuals who have taken the experimental COVID-19 vaccine. If you have taken any one of these toxic poisons, please contact us by email, sovereignize@gmail.com, or call 250.763.2428, and we may be able to conduct business with you over the internet or phone.

Kent Molgat, VIDEO: Kelowna gold shop rejects masks and vaccines, KelownaNow (April 22, 2021). Retrieved May 8, 2021, from https://www.kelownanow.com/watercooler/news/news/Kelowna/VIDEO_Kelowna_Silver_and_Gold_shop_rejects_masks_and_vaccines/#fs_98463

Parting words

We are now at the point where many, due to their reckless decision to get the COVID death shot, not only are a threat to themselves, but to all of us. They should be quarantined, or at least distanced from others.

But — our governments of course encourage the opposite, to apparently fulfill the desire of Bill Gates and other criminal globalists to depopulate the world of us plebian “pests.”

It’s up to us who know about the COVID vaccine transmission to get the word out and encourage others to take precautions. If we do so, perhaps some who are vaccinated will be compelled by their conscience to do the right thing and distance or quarantine. Maybe we will see more businesses restrict or bar the vaccinated from entry for the sake of others (they can still provide services to the vaccinated in other ways, such as via home delivery or curbside pickup). Maybe pastors will warn those in their church about the vaccine dangers and implement procedures to protect their flock. And maybe some local governments will actually implement quarantine along with ending the murderous COVID vaccine program.

However, let’s not treat the vaccinated as subhuman. They still have physical, emotional, and spiritual needs. They made a horrible choice — but we don’t cast them aside because of this. For those of us who are Christians, God accepted us despite much worse actions on our part. We can take precautions and still minister to them.

Image credit:
___________________
Passengers on a ship undergoing quarantine examination during the Egyptian cholera epidemic of 1883. Wood engraving, 1883. Credit: Wellcome CollectionCC BY 4.0

Notes
_________________________________________

[1] Pfizer, A Phase 1/2/3 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals, 69. Retrieved May 8, 2021, from https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf.
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Health Security, “Technologies to Address Global Catastrophic Biological Risks”(2018), 6. Retrieved May 8, 2021, from https://jhsphcenterforhealthsecurity.s3.amazonaws.com/181009-gcbr-tech-report.pdf
[3] Ibid., 45.
[4] Ibid., 47.
[5] Wendy E. Parmet, “Public Health Practices in the Colonial and Federalist Periods.” Retrieved February 17, 2015 from http://academic.udayton.edu/health/syllabi/bioterrorism/4phealthlaw/PHLaw00c.htm. Internet piece excerpted from Wendy E. Parmet, “Health Care and the Constitution: Public Health and the Role of the State in the Framing Era,” 20 Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly (Winter, 1992) 267-335, 285-302.
[6] Hansard, Vaccine Inoculation, vol 7 cc879-99 (UK Parliament, July 2, 1806). Retrieved April 18, 2019, from https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1806/jul/02/vaccine-inoculation#S1V0007P0_18060702_HOC_21
Sadly, as evidenced in this speech, Wilberforce was favorable to smallpox vaccination. We all have our blind spots.

If you find this site helpful, please consider supporting our work.

(Visited 942 times, 1 visits today)
Tagged , ,