Vaccination regularly injures and kills, and so compulsory vaccination is a declaration of war by the state against its people.
The church needs to use its influence against mandatory vaccination NOW, as we don’t want a civil war (of any kind) to occur. There isn’t much time, as vaccine tyranny is rapidly increasing.
Some sobering insights on this topic were given long ago by J. J. Garth Wilkinson, who resided in Great Britain in the 1800s. (Disclaimer: we do not endorse his theological writings.) Wilkinson discusses the matter of mandatory vaccination provoking civil war in his book Compulsory Vaccination: Its Wickedness to the Poor (1873).
In one section, Wilkinson documents his “Points Submitted to the Vaccination Committee of the House of Commons.” In point XIII, he writes:
That the poorer classes will become a league of secrecy against such acts; and concealment of births, or false Vaccinations, and forging of Vaccination certificates, will be means of public safety. (p. 41)
He then raises the matter of civil war in point XIV:
That resistance to the mother’s knowledge, erroneous or not, that one child has been poisoned, or killed, by Vaccination, and forcing her to have the next child Vaccinated, is a procedure which, if insisted on by Parliament, will cause virtual, and chronic, though it may be covered, civil war. The Acts that do it are regarded as declarations of war against, and as invasion of, poor men’s homes. They may seem to triumph, but resistance will be perpetual. (pp. 41, 42)
Elsewhere in the book, Wilkinson elaborates on what such a civil war might look like. It doesn’t have to entail actual battles, but methods to avoid vaccination:
Even the present law, if unrepealed, will lead to civil war of its own kind. Against the mother who has one child destroyed, or badly poisoned, by Vaccination, and is compelled to bring up another and another to the same ruin, it is civil war; and she, and her kind, will elude it not by the laws of peace, but by the ways of war. If she has strong convictions, who can say what is not lawful for her to do ? She may conceal her births ; and to do so, call into existence a new and clandestine class of midwives who will turn the doctors out of the neighbourhoods of the poor. She may invent substitutes for Vaccination, such as tartar emetic injected under the skin, and forged certificates on a large scale. She will assuredly do everything to barricade her room and her neighbourhood against the compulsory Vaccinator. In the process, a complete alienation must occur between the poor and the medical profession. And a new, an unrecognized, and probably secret medical service must supply the traitor’s place among the poor. (p. 31)
One last interesting quote is again from his “Points Submitted to the Vaccination Committee of the House of Commons.” In point XV, he comments on punishments against non-violent opponents of vaccination actually backfiring:
That Law Courts could not carry out punishments against poor men and poor women if they oppose violent resistance to violent Vaccination. The moral sense and sympathy of the constituencies will be entirely with the poorer combatants. (p. 42)
J. J. Garth Wilkinson, Compulsory Vaccination: Its Wickedness to the Poor (London: F. Pitman, 1873)
If you find this site helpful, please consider supporting our work.
